Piikani Nation Treaty

ALL GRIZZLY

READ THE SCIENCE!

Find out everything you ever wanted to know about the biology and ecology of grizzly bears. Authored by world-renowned bear biologist Dr. David Mattson, this site summarizes and synthesizes in beautiful graphic form the science of grizzly bears.

PIIKANI NATION TREATY

Find out how much Native Americans care about the grizzly bear, with a Grizzly Treaty that has been signed by more than 270 tribes, as well as numerous traditional societies and leaders. The document has become a symbol of international unity in defense of sovereignty, spiritual and religious protection, and treaty rights. 

MOSTLY NATURAL GRIZZLIES

For an in depth and comprehensive look at the ecology and demography of grizzly bears in the northern US Rocky Mountains, along with all the research relevant to conservation of these bears, see Mostly Natural History of the Northern Rocky Mountains.

GOAL TRIBAL COALITION

GOAL is a coalition of nearly 50 tribes  (and counting) who object to the federal and state plans to delist grizzly bears prematurely and allow trophy

hunting of this sacred being.

GOAL advocates for the tribes'

legal right to meaningful consultation and also for the reconection of tribal peoples to their traditional homelands

Legal / Copyrights      II     Website disclaimer    II     Terms of Use    II     Privacy Policy      II     About Us     II      Blog       II      Grizzly Times Podcast     II      FAQs   II    Contact Us

This website and its content is copyright of Grizzly Times © Louisa Willcox 2017. All rights reserved

THE PUBLIC BACKS BEARS

Public Opposition to Delisting

 

In the public processes related to management of Yellowstone grizzly bears during the last two decades, the public has come out swinging for bears and their habitat. These relate to revisions of the 1992 federal recovery plan, habitat management standards, state plans, and two delisting proposals. 

 

The most recent public process, triggered in 2016 by the decision to remove protections for the Yellowstone grizzly bear (“delist”) a second time, precipitated the largest response from the public ever. Over 99% of the more than 850,000 comments expressed vigorous opposition to delisting and support for stronger protections. In each previous case, the final plans that were adopted were virtually unchanged in response to public comments.

 

Following is a summary of public comments, including where and when they were registered. These summaries pertain to all of the grizzly bear-related planning processes except to two undertaken by Montana. 

 

  • In 1997, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) released a “Habitat Based Criteria” plan, designed to establish habitat goals for recovery in response to a federal court ruling in 1995. Of the 15,750 comments submitted to FWS, over 97% expressed support for strengthening habitat standards.  

 

  • In 2000, the FWS released the Draft Conservation Strategy, directing the implementation of the Habitat Based Criteria. The FWS received 16,794 comments, of which over 99% supported strengthening the plan.

 

  • In 2001, the state of Wyoming released its plan for management of the grizzly after delisting.  Over 8,000 comments were submitted, more than have been received for any other wildlife plan in Wyoming history, “shattering the record,” according to Wyoming Game and Fish Information Officer Larry Kruckenberg.  Over 95% of the comments were in support of strengthening grizzly protections and expanding grizzly range beyond the FWS recovery zone line. 

 

  • As part of the Wyoming planning effort, a 2001 telephone survey of Wyoming citizens was conducted inquiring into peoples’ attitudes towards grizzlies. This survey was solicited by Wyoming Game and Fish. Of the 1500 citizens interviewed, 87% agreed that grizzlies are an important component of their ecosystem, and 74% agreed that grizzlies are a great benefit to Wyoming.  And a majority of respondents supported a plan that would allow grizzlies to expand into all suitable habitats in Wyoming (66%), including the Wyoming Range (73%) and Wind River Mountains (67%).

 

  • In 2001, the state of Idaho also released its draft plan for managing grizzlies after delisting.  Over 80% of these comments supported stronger protections for the grizzly.
     

  • Only Montana, which developed a plan in 2003, revised slightly in 2013, did not tally public comments.
      

  • In 2006, FWS released a draft plan to remove protections from Yellowstone grizzlies. Over 99% of the roughly 212,000 comments submitted on the plan opposed delisting and supported stronger  protections for the grizzly.
     

  • In 2016, FWS released another draft plan to strip protections from Yellowstone grizzlies. Over  99% of the roughly 850,000 comments submitted on the plan opposed delisting and supported stronger protections.

In conclusion, public sentiment has been consistently and clearly supportive of not only maintaining, but expanding current levels of protection for bears. It is time that the government listen.

 

Read more on what people had to say...

MORE ARTICLES DEBUNKING DELISTING

Delisting: a bad idea

Yellowstone’s grizzly bear population is still not recovered! Yellowstone’s population of roughly 750 grizzly bears is completely isolated from all other grizzly bear populations and much smaller than the 2000+ animals widely considered necessary for long-term viability. 

Agency Spin

Read a summary of the key claims of being made by government scientists and managers, and a  response to each. its necessarily long due to the complexity of the issues presented. But its worth understanding what is really going on.

Food Fight

In 2009, federal endangered species protections were restored for the Yellowstone grizzly bear population in response to a court ruling that found that the government had failed to evaluate the effects of the collapse of whitebark pine, a key staple for the population. In 2013, the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team (IGBST) issued a report, “Response of Yellowstone grizzly bears to changes in food resources: a synthesis”, that concluded that whitebark pine was not essential for recovery of the Yellowstone grizzly bear.  REALLY IGBST??

What the People Say

According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), over 850,000 comments were submitted on the 2016 proposal to remove endangered species protections (“delist”) the Yellowstone grizzly bear.  Over 99% of those comments opposed delisting.  

Public Backs Bears

In the public processes related to management of Yellowstone grizzly bears during the last two decades, the public has come out swinging for bears and their habitat.